T
Ꮛ Ꭵ
136
tommIgih ToŤ SI·Bivba tripont azelau eIdirekam e: nee moitDes
.BROBCAT
erit rebrum bertusco ever dette serre evit and to efirdau
"led mvig ene mnoltoeE
Look com
!
Pe lubrum to marro 2 hp "croll no [ye0" və mal¬hnum o Benro ♪ ored babor f breezarodoŸ‚nedoriƐ mill yn Fangianon,"ureM_AWA" To
od her moge adsom arf" „meiƐ at tæmqideamd 76% „SIVI „redatno ni arend b,dodgend 1.00 a kv© tot lehamani anew sesso art tent woda
arið en empra eit eram .00 ủ tưð doit enmbive Intom grotte eew
esi79 ent ni adret oud erant o tom .00 a mmirð to mit vermeð
eIftreogni ton *! Lowiemgra bre #lehtib need even bluar tru
ogros Bríd deg od stqatde Innovce afsa bad adai.I menY nocq?' ent
+
„Jouwk „#‡oI erit no hetists: 1 orew »bog eft .uril od fquorit of anisom artron: ond natta ‚d[VI to £$ .di comnik10 who ‚DNI
hovlecer now mhein oli „rooqqe don hih reddef ant .araogide eit
.
*
nt in noite er mos ni .asergienon are so eroqqina act reidke mor? -:DIEI „FerguĀ „K+CS no hajunkm I saro mids
vrev ad at tripuro se deria email dreqer of såll Home I* moltoaz ert mbet nemad et ewhonorq que trode Litetra javh, ed Flora sonomi-lo aldineog derð ben „moidamun ri visit guideða bere gaireaqqe to ydinudrocqo Ilut s
."æske In
re Iðuď vď herra lemon "adre [ftaX" va saimhere to anzo I to dreq
·
had anna eft .groznoH Loð á Tohfasi .8 .A od „XTOY -8} ‚.mo«8 adî .tayud amevido a of stedvoqni er vi boravileb need ybreni-
„Načo act no hadietro* one- aboo; mifi „ametroqú eft at mora- vd herreogn cili jamanaqui adt To Fueenr end date DINI YM
„OI mitoes mbru na sera mirt M we ant no rat toifon 2
Moff en.D
erer „dofgr-5 1.00 3 trin.l në mengidement vo↑ Iron to rged ODI
forfeited on the 25th. May, 1916. The Shipping Company concerned, the Osaka Shosen Kaisha, appeared and consented.
Case No. 4.
10 cases of eggs ex "Choy Sang", consimed by Hencarini & Co., Shanghai, to (8) N.T.Hashim & Co., Manila. The perishable nature of the cargo, which was deteriorating, necessitated some prompt action in the interests of all parties, as the onses could not be allowed to go forward, Mencarini & Co. were communicated witłu by telegram. The goods were forfeited under Ordinance No. 22 of 1915, on the 10th. June, 1916. The proceeds were subsequently paid to Mencarini & Co. and accepted by them.
Case No. 5.
52 cases of Wood Ter, consigned to order but know to be from Bergmann & Co. Yokohama, to (S) Carl Schlieper & Co., Somarang, removed from "Hokuto Maru" with the consent of the Japanese Consul- -General. This was forfeited on the 16th, June, 1916, after notice
to the shipping ngents. In this case, through a misapprehension, the notice wa rather too short, but no claim has ever been
received.
9.
Two cases where the section was not applied are added by way u
of illustration.
Illustration 1.
3 cases of curios, transhipment cargo ex "Banri Maru" consigned by Yamagataya, Yokohama, to G. C. Kuneman, of G. Hoppenstedt & Co., Batavia. None of these names were on the Statutory List but in- -tercepted letters showed that the real shippers were (8) Bergmann & Co. and that Kunanan knew it. The Government were asked to authorise an application for forfeiture. I minuted on 20th. Novemb-
-er, 1916:-
*It might be forfeited. .It is probably still the property
of Bergmann & Co., and we could prosecute the mater of the ship, and in case of somviction the goods might
be
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.